BIRDS’ NAMES AND THEIR SYMBOLIC MEANINGS IN ENGLISH PHRASEOLOGICAL WORD COMBINATIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2412-933Х/2024-ХХI-7

Keywords:

zoolexema, ornitonomen, symbol, phraseological unit, axiological potential, linguistic conceptual framework, motivation

Abstract

In this article, the authors undertake an exploration into the intricate dynamics of ornithonomies within the English linguistic conceptual framework, delving into the frequency of utilization of bird names and their symbolic significance within English phraseological expressions. The research not only scrutinizes the prevalence of these avian lexical elements but also discerns the underlying factors that contribute to the formation of a distinct national ornithosymbolism. This comprehensive analysis extends to the axiological potential embedded in these ornithonomena, unraveling the motivational forces that drive their integration into the linguistic fabric. By systematically examining the frequency of bird names in phraseological combinations, the study sheds light on the nuanced interplay between language and cultural symbolism. The authors systematically dissect the semantic weight carried by these avian descriptors, discerning their role in shaping the metaphorical richness of English expressions. Furthermore, the exploration extends to the sociocultural factors that influence the development of national ornithosymbolism, elucidating the intricate web of cultural, historical, and environmental elements that contribute to the lexicocultural tapestry. The elucidation of the axiological potential of ornithonomies not only deepens our understanding of linguistic symbolism but also offers insights into the broader cultural values embedded in the English language. Through meticulous analysis, the article contributes to the scholarly discourse on the motivations behind the incorporation of bird names into the linguistic repertoire, unraveling the layers of cultural significance that enrich the linguistic picture of the world in English.

References

Barantsev, K.T. (ukl.) (2005). Anhlo-ukrainskyi frazeolohichnyi slovnyk [English-Ukrainian phraseologicaldictionary]. 2-he vyd., vypr. Kyiv: Znannia” KOO. 1056 p. [in Ukrainian].

Honcharova, T.I. (1996). Spilnit ta spetsyfika movnykh zoomorfnykh kartyn svitu [Commonalities and specificity of linguistic zoomorphic pictures of the world]. Candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv. 22 p. [in Ukrainian].

Dudyk, P.S. (2005). Stylistyka ukrainskoi movy: navchalnyi posibnyk [Stylistics of the Ukrainian language: a textbook]. Kyiv: Akademiia. 368 p. [in Ukrainian].

Kutsyk, O.A. (1995). Slova iz symvolichnym znachenniam v osnovi ukrainskykh frazem [Words with symbolic meaning in the basis of Ukrainian phrases] Materialy Vseukrainskoi naukovoi konferentsii “Problemy zistavnoi semantyky”. Kyiv: KDLU. P. 112–113 [in Ukrainian].

Lazer-Pankiv, O.V. (2012). Strukturno-semantychnyi analiz frazeolohizmiv iz komponentom-ornitonimom. [Structural and semantic analysis of phraseological units with an ornithonym component]. Studia linguistica. Issue 6 (1). P. 259–264 [in Ukrainian].

Bilonozhenko, V.M. (ukl.) (2003). Slovnyk frazeolohizmiv ukrainskoi movy [Dictionary of phraseological units of the Ukrainian language]. Kyiv: Nauk. dumka. 1104 p. [in Ukrainian].

Uzhchenko, V.D., Uzhchenko, D.V. (1998). Frazeolohichnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Phraseological dictionary of the Ukrainian language]. Kyiv: Osvita. 224 p. [in Ukrainian].

Skopnenko, O.I., Tsymbaliuk, T.V. (ukl.) (2002). Frazeolohiia perekladiv: Slovnyk-dovidnyk [Phraseology of translations: Dictionary-reference]. Kyiv: Dovira. 735 p. [in Ukrainian].

Chornobai, S. (2006). Idiomatychna frazeolohiia ta movna kartyna svitu (na materiali somatychnykh frazeolohichnykh odynyts anhliiskoi, novohretskoi ta ukrainskoi mov) [Idiomatic phraseology and linguistic picture of the world (based on the material somatic phraseological units of English, Modern Greek and Ukrainian languages)]. Semantyka movy i tekstu: Materialy IХ mizhnar. nauk. konf. Ivano-Frankivsk. P. 291–293 [in Ukrainian].

Fauconnier. G. (1999). Methods and Generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, Foundations, Scope, and Methodology. Berlin. N.Y. 418 p.

Pederson, E., Nuyts J. (1997). Overview: On the Relationship between Language and Conceptualization. Language and Conceptualization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 11–12, 121.

Post, M. (1988). Scenes and Frames Semantics as a Neo-Lexical Field Theory. Understanding the Lexicon: Meaning, Sense and World Knowledge in Lexical Semantics / Ed. by W. Hullen and K. Schulze. Tubingen: Niemeyer. P. 36–37.

Rosh, E.H. (1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Vol. 104. P. 192–233.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-02