TALK TO ME: A DIALOGUE WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ABOUT ITS USE IN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31494/2412-9208-2023-1-1-43-55Keywords:
artificial intelligence, large language models, ChatGPT, education, science.Abstract
The article explores the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the educational process, writing scientific articles, and the ethical issues that arise with its application. The research is based on an analysis of dialogue with the chatbot ChatGPT, examining the possibilities of using AI in learning and science. The results of the analysis, along with the study of relevant literature sources, lead to the conclusion that caution is needed when using language models based on AI. The article discusses issues of academic integrity when applying artificial intelligence for text generation. It is pointed out that these issues and ethical aspects are not yet regulated at the legislative and academic levels, as ChatGPT has only existed for a few months, and appropriate regulatory mechanisms are still being formed. In particular, it is highlighted that ChatGPT is proficient in text generation technology but sometimes makes mistakes and provides false information. This can create difficulties for users who rely on accuracy and reliability of the information received. The article's results aim to help readers better understand the potential of artificial intelligence in education and research, as well as the problems associated with its application. Possible ways to optimize the use of AI technologies in the academic environment are identified, and the importance of developing critical thinking and information evaluation skills is emphasized. The focus is on the need to raise students', teachers', and researchers' awareness of the potential challenges and limitations AI may have in research activities. Furthermore, the article discusses the role of universities and scientific communities in developing strategies that promote the ethical use of AI in education and research. It is emphasized that it is important to consider both the positive aspects of AI and the potential risks to academic integrity and research quality. One solution could be the implementation of special courses on AI ethics, which would help students and researchers better understand various aspects of AI technologies, including their practical and ethical sides. Active collaboration between academic institutions and AI development companies is also recommended, with the aim of developing safer and more responsible language models. Considering the rapid development of AI, the authors call for accelerating the creation of national and international legal frameworks that would regulate the use of artificial intelligence in education and research. The article underlines the need for a broad discussion among representatives of the scientific community, legislators, and the public on the ethical issues and possible consequences of using AI in the academic world.
References
Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 10776958221149577. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577
Else, H. (2023). Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature, 613(7944), 423-423. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7
Cahan, P., & Treutlein, B. (2023). A conversation with ChatGPT on the role of computational systems biology in stem cell research. Stem Cell Reports, 18(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.12.009
Chatterjee, J., & Dethlefs, N. (2023). This new conversational AI model can be your friend, philosopher, and guide... and even your worst enemy. Patterns, 4(1), 100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100676
Graham, F. (2022). Daily briefing: Will ChatGPT kill the essay assignment? Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04437-2
Huh, S. (2023) Are ChatGPT’s knowledge and interpretation ability comparable to those of medical students in Korea for taking a parasitology examination?: a descriptive study. J Educ Eval Health Prof, 20: 1. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.1
Looi, M. K. (2023). Sixty seconds on... ChatGPT. BMJ 2023;380:p205. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p205
Mollman S. (2022, December 9). ChatGPT has gained 1 million followers in a single week. Here’s why the A.I. chatbot is primed to disrupt search as we know it. Yahoo Finance. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chatgpt-gained-1-million-followers-224523258.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAFoaVt0Jgmrz33m4F8LQ93tU37YKNp45BNiRU295yW5YSO9PkirImoDOfHuNU3b9C9E4zFl6W1R6mSZrM5SFK7y0Au9ht-wMKUfBuhQ0Y254BzjvjaYypRR60aUlPgL3xfTqaM81r3SoP4-QEwJD1lW3avB5uVyxoyu0Src7ffpU
Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating With Considering the Implications of Generative Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature, 613(7945), с. 612 doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
Stokel-Walker, C. (2022). AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays-should academics worry? Nature. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7
Stokel-Walker, C., & Van Noorden, R. (2023). What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. Nature, 614(7947), 214-216. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6
Suchikova Y. (2023). A year of war. Science. 379(6634), 850.
Suchikova Y., Tsybuliak N. (2023) Universities without walls: global trend v. Ukraine’s reality. Nature 614, 413. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00380-y
van Dis, E. A., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224-226.
