CLIL PROJECTS IN THE TRAINING OF SPECIALISTS IN “GEODESY AND LAND MANAGEMENT”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2412-9208-2025-3-165-180Keywords:
CLIL, geodesy, land management, 4C, triple literacy, GIS, distance and blended learning, visual–narrative practices, digital competenceAbstract
The article delves into the integration of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) into the professional training of students majoring in Geodesy and Land Management within the context of educational digitalisation and globalisation. CLIL is presented as a dynamic interdisciplinary strategy that seamlessly combines subject content, Englishmedium communication, and digital technologies through project-based and blended learning. The purpose of the study is to design a CLIL model that unites the 4C framework (Content, Communication, Cognition, Culture)-a framework that emphasizes the integration of subject content, language, and culture, and the principle of “triple literacy” (linguistic, digital, and spatial)-a concept that promotes proficiency in three key areas of literacy, and incorporates visual-narrative practices into geodetic education. The methodology is based on an analytical review of current CLIL/EMI and digital competence research (DigComp, DigCompEdu), a synthesis of European experience, and practical implementation of Geographic Information Systems (QGIS, ArcGIS, Sentinel Hub, StoryMaps, Google Earth Engine). The paper outlines a series of CLIL project formats – Geo-visual Report, 3D Landscape Mapping, Virtual Field Trip, Data Storytelling, GeoPoster, and GeoPodcast–that foster students’ professional English competence, analytical and visual thinking, intercultural communication, and academic mobility, offering promising benefits for geodetic education. The novelty of the study lies in adapting European CLIL approaches to the Ukrainian technical context, integrating content, language, and technology into a unified educational system. The practical significance is reflected in the model's applicability for developing English-medium courses in technical universities, thereby enhancing the quality of professional training and increasing the international attractiveness of Ukrainian geodetic education.
References
D’Agostino L., Santus D. Teaching geography and blended learning: Interdisciplinary and new learning possibilities. AIMS Geosciences, 2022. 8(2), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2022016
Economou A., Kapsalis G., Gkolia A. Educators’ perceptions of their digital competence: The case of the DIGCOMPEDU CheckIn tool. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI 2023) 2023. pp. 120–130. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2023.0120
Graziano T. The insiders' gaze: Fieldworks, social media and visual methodologies in urban tourism. AIMS Geosciences, 2022. 8(3), 366–384. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2022021
Hibszer A., Tracz M. An evaluation of the effectiveness of distance learning using ICT in geographical education: From the experiences of teachers in Poland. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 2023. 11(2), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2023-0021
Martínez-Soto T., Prendes-Espinosa M. P. A systematic review on the role of ICT and CLIL in compulsory education. Education Sciences, 2023. 13(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010073
Messina G. Islands of fire: Stromboli in the documentary by Vittorio De Seta. AIMS Geosciences, 2020. 6(3), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2020017
Plaza Merino P., Sancristóbal E., Carro Fernández G., Castro M. Teaching technology with CLIL methodology: A case study. In IEEE EDUCON 2013 – Global Engineering Education Conference. 2013. pp. 653–657. https://doi.org/10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530164
Rachmawati Y., Adnan M., Rachman M. Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through technology-enhanced content and languageintegrated learning (T-CLIL) instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 2021. 26(5), 5489–5507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10648-3
Redecke C., Punie Y. The digital competence of academics in higher education: Is the glass half empty or half full? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2022. 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00376-0
D’Agostino L., Santus D. Teaching geography and blended learning: Interdisciplinary and new learning possibilities. AIMS Geosciences, 2022. 8(2), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2022016
Economou A., Kapsalis G., Gkolia A. Educators’ perceptions of their digital competence: The case of the DIGCOMPEDU CheckIn tool. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI 2023) 2023. pp. 120–130. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2023.0120
Graziano T. The insiders' gaze: Fieldworks, social media and visual methodologiesin urban tourism. AIMS Geosciences, 2022. 8(3), 366–384. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2022021
Hibszer A., Tracz M. An evaluation of the effectiveness of distance learning using ICT in geographical education: From the experiences of teachers in Poland. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 2023. 11(2), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2023-0021
Martínez-Soto T., Prendes-Espinosa M. P. A systematic review on the role of ICT and CLIL in compulsory education. Education Sciences, 2023. 13(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010073
Messina G. Islands of fire: Stromboli in the documentary by Vittorio De Seta. AIMS Geosciences, 2020. 6(3), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2020017
Plaza Merino P., Sancristóbal E., Carro Fernández G., Castro M. Teaching technology with CLIL methodology: A case study. In IEEE EDUCON 2013 – Global Engineering Education Conference 2013. (pp. 653–657). https://doi.org/10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530164
Rachmawati Y., Adnan M., Rachman M. Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through technology-enhanced content and languageintegrated learning (T-CLIL) instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 2021. 26(5), 5489–5507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10648-3
Redecker C., Punie, Y. The digital competence of academics in higher education: Is the glass half empty or half full? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2022. 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00376-0






