THE NARRATIVE STRUCTURE OF ONLINE NEWS: COGNITIVE MODELS AND PRAGMATIC FUNCTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2412-933X/2025-XXV-1Keywords:
online news, narrative structure, cognitive models, pragmatic functions, headlines, media discourse, misinformationAbstract
This article presents a comprehensive study of the narrative structure of online news through the framework of cognitive models and pragmatic functions. The theoretical foundation combines insights from cognitive linguistics, which explains the role of schemata and idealized cognitive models in meaning construction, with pragmatic approaches to discourse analysis that reveal the communicative goals of journalistic texts. A review of scholarly literature demonstrates that headlines and other small-format elements of online journalism serve not only as informational devices but also as influential cues that elicit emotional responses, activate cognitive schemata, and guide interpretation.The methodology integrates corpus analysis of online news articles, automated annotation of narrative and pragmatic features, and experimental research into audience responses. Particular attention is given to individual cognitive dispositions that shape differences in how readers perceive dramatization, emotional intensity, and simplified causal structures.The findings indicate that these strategies substantially increase engagement and shareability in digital environments, yet simultaneously diminish trust and critical evaluation of content. The study concludes that online news has a dual nature: it relies on familiar cognitive models to facilitate rapid meaning-making, while pragmatically oriented toward capturing attention, persuading audiences, or achieving commercial success. The implications of the research extend to journalism practice, where ethical headline design and transparent narrative strategies can foster credibility, and to media literacy, where awareness of cognitive and pragmatic mechanisms can strengthen critical reading skills.Ultimately, this work underscores the need for balancing communicative effectiveness with epistemic responsibility in the evolving digital media landscape.
References
Bednarek M., Caple H. Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analysing news discourse in critical discourse analysis and beyond. Discourse & Communication. 2014. Vol. 8, No. 2. P. 135–157. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09579265135160414
Dor D. On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics. 2013. Vol. 35, No. 5. P. 695–721. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00134-0
Fagerjord A., Storsul T. Questioning convergence: The case of multimedia journalism. Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning. 2017. Vol. 48, No. 2. P. 227–248. URL: https://doi.org/10.18261/ ISSN1504-291X-2007-02-05
Fillmore C. J. Frame Semantics. In: The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.). Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 2009. P. 111–137.
Gibson R., Zillmann D. Exaggerated versus representative exemplification in news reports: Percep- tion of issues and personal consequences. Communication Research. 2008. Vol. 25, No. 6. P. 635–654. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025006002
Hamby A., Kettle K., Gunaratna S. Sensational stories: The role of narrative characteristics in real and fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2024. Vol. 30, No. 1. P. 1–15. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000456
Ifantidou E. Newspaper headlines, relevance and emotive effects. Pragmatics and Society. 2023. Vol. 14, No. 1. P. 1–20. URL: https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22044.ifa
Kuiken J., Schuth A., Spitters M., Marx M. Effective headlines of newspaper articles in a digital environment. Digital Journalism. 2017. Vol. 5, No. 10. P. 1300–1314. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1279978
Piazza R. A pragmatic cognitive model for the interpretation of verbal–visual communication in television news programmes. Language and Cognition. 2016. Vol. 8, No. 2. P. 263–289. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.31
Van Dijk T. A. Discourse and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. 254 p.






