CURRENT TRENDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF OFFICERS’ INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCE: THE EXPERIENCE OF NATO MEMBER STATES’ MILITARY EDUCATION AND TRAINING INSTITUTIONS
Keywords:
intercultural competence, operational level, professional military education, operational planning, civil-military interaction, multinational headquarters, interoperability.Abstract
The article examines the problem of developing intercultural competence among operational-level officers in the context of the growing role of multinational headquarters and joint operational planning. The relevance of the topic is driven by the fact that, in scholarly and applied publications, the intercultural dimension of officer training is often described in general terms, while specific educational mechanisms through which intercultural competence becomes an applied capability needed for staff work and coalition environments remain insufficiently explored. The purpose of the study is to identify current trends in the development of intercultural competence through the example of military education and training institutions of the member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and to substantiate which elements of content, organization, and training methodology ensure its functional character in an officer’s professional activity. The methodological framework includes content analysis of doctrinal and program materials, comparative analysis of institutional cases, and structural-functional synthesis. The empirical basis was formed from publicly available descriptions of programs and courses offered by the Polish War Studies University, the Canadian Forces College, the Joint Warfare Centre, and the Centre of Excellence for civil-military cooperation in The Hague. The study shows that the development of intercultural competence in contemporary professional military education is systemic and is achieved through the institutional embedding of the intercultural dimension into standardized planning procedures, collective command-and-staff training, and civil-military interaction practices. It is demonstrated that the most effective training elements are those that organize work in planning groups, stimulate negotiation and coordination, ensure consistency of terms and assumptions. It is substantiated that socio-cultural differences within such programs are treated as a planning and management factor alongside resource parameters and constraint systems. The novelty of the article lies in defining intercultural competence of operational-level officers not as a set of isolated skills, but as a functional professional quality formed through specific educational mechanisms integrated into the content, methodology, and practice-oriented training formats approximating real conditions of planning and conducting operations.
References
Собора А.І., Акимов О.О., Холодний Р.В. Понятійний апарат дизайну операції відповідно до стандартів НАТО. Випробування та сертифікація. № 3(5). 2024. C. 30–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37701/ts.05.2024.04
AAP-06. Edition 2020. NATO glossary of terms and definitions (english and french). 2020. 273 p.
Allied joint doctrine for the conduct of operations. AJP-3. Edition C. Version 1. 164 p.
Allied joint movement and transportation doctrine. AJP- 4.4. Edition B. Version 1. 2013. 90 р.
Canadian Forces College. URL: https://www.cfc.forces.gc.ca/254-eng.html.
CIMIC Handbook. Hague: Civil-Military Cooperation Centre of Excellence. 2025. 90 р.
Civil-Military Cooperation Centre of Excellence . History. URL: https://www.cimic-coe.org/about/history/.
Civil-Military Cooperation Centre of Excellence . URL: https://www.cimic-coe.org/.
Comprehensive operations planning directive. Version 3.1. 13 October 2023. 412 p.
Cummings J.J., Bailenson J.N. How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence. Media Psychology. 2015. 38 р.
Grant B.S. A comprehensive set of scenario activities aligned to objectives designed to reinforce knowledge and skills at the end of a sequence of training. Cases on Performance Improvement Innovation. 2020. Р. 208-228.
NATO CIMIC Analysis and Assessment Course. URL: https://www.cimic-coe.org/courses/nato-cimic-analysis-and-assessment-course/.
NATO CIMIC Field Worker Course. URL: https://www.cimic-coe.org/courses/nato-cimic-field-worker-course/.
NATO CIMIC Functional Specialist Course. URL: https://www.cimic-coe.org/courses/nato-cimic-functional-specialist-course/.
NATO CIMIC Higher Command Course. URL: https://www.cimic-coe.org/courses/nato-cimic-higher-command-course/.
NATO CIMIC Liaison Course. URL: https://www.cimic-coe.org/courses/nato-cimic-liaison-course/.
NATO CIMIC Staff Worker Course. URL: https://www.cimic-coe.org/courses/nato-cimic-staff-worker-course/.
NATO STANDARD AJP-3.2 Allied joint doctrine for land operations. Edition B. Version 1. February 2022. 144 р.
NATO’s Joint Warfare Centre. URL: https://www.jwc.nato.int/about/who-we-are/?utm_source.
Strategia Akademii sztuki Wojennej. URL: https://www.wojsko-polskie.pl/aszwoj/o-akademii-strategia/.
Syllabus of Joint Command And Staff Programme (JCSP). 2025. 49 p. URL: https://www.cfc.forces.gc.ca/118/50/cfc300-50-eng.pdf.
The JWC’s 11 Core Exercise Functions. The Three Swords. 2023. Р. 53–57.




