METAPHORICAL MODELS OF “BEAUTY/DECAY” IN DORIAN GRAY’S LINGUISTIC PORTRAIT: A LINGUO-COGNITIVE AND LINGUO-PRAGMATIC COMPARISON OF OSCAR WILDE’S NOVEL AND THE 1945 FILM ADAPTATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2412-933X/2026-XXVI-6Keywords:
metaphorical model, conceptual metaphor, beauty, decay, linguistic portraitAbstract
The article offers a linguo-cognitive and linguo-pragmatic comparison of the metaphorical models of “beauty/decay” that shape Dorian Gray’s linguistic portrait in Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray and in its 1945 film adaptation (dir. Albert Lewin). The research material comprises the text of the novel and the 1945 screen adaptation. The methodological framework relies on interpreting metaphor as a mechanism of conceptualisation and evaluative categorisation, as well as on a comparative analysis of the pragmatic functions of metaphors in the character’s self-presentation and in the structure of his interaction with other characters. Four dominant models are identified: YOUTH/BEAUTY IS VALUE/RESOURCE, TIME AS A JEALOUS AGENT/ENEMY, PORTRAIT AS SOUL/MORAL RECORD, and DECAY AS INSCRIPTION/SCARRING. It is established that the 1945 adaptation largely preserves the conceptual correspondences, yet systematically modifies their rhetorical organisation and pragmatic orientation. The comparison reveals a tendency toward reducing figurative peripheral imagery and increasing the aphoristic density of lines; consequently, metaphors more often function as high-force directives or self-declarations that accelerate character construction and fix an evaluative perspective on the protagonist. The most salient shift is observed in the PORTRAIT AS SOUL/MORAL RECORD model: in the film text, the moral meaning of the portrait is more frequently explicated at the level of an utterance, moving the conflict from symbolic interpretation to communicative demonstration and control over access to “truth.” The article concludes that the difference between the novel and the adaptation lies not in the set of basic metaphors, but in the way they operate pragmatically within the character’s linguistic portrait.
References
Бережна М. Мовленнєвий портрет персонажів, які відповідають архетипу «Горгона» (у фільмі Т. Бертона Alice in Wonderland). DOI: 10.31812/123456789/5316.
Asatiani N., Tsiklauri K., Verbi L. The Concept of Beauty in Oscar Wilde’s “The Picture of Dorian Gray”. Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences. 2022. Vol. 15. № 1. P. 129–137. DOI: 10.62343/cjss.2022.217.
Forceville C. Identifying and Interpreting Visual and Multimodal Metaphor in Commercials and Feature Films. Metaphor and Symbol. 2024. Vol. 39. № 1. P. 40–54. DOI: 10.1080/10926488.2023.2271544.
Hutcheon L. A Theory of Adaptation. 2nd ed. New York : Routledge, 2013. 296 р.
Kosenko A. Aesthetic and Ethical Assessments in Oscar Wilde’s Novel The Picture of Dorian Gray. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Серія : Філологія. 2018. № 36. Т. 1. С. 167–171.
Kövecses Z. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2020. 331 р. DOI: 10.1017/9781108859127.
Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1980. 242 р.
Pham N. T. B. From Megametaphor to Macrostructure: Moral Metaphor and Blending in The Picture of Dorian Gray. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2024. Vol. 10. №. 2. P. 241–253. DOI : 10.32601/ejal.10220.
Picture of Dorian Gray : movie script. URL: https://www.stockq.org/moviescript/P/picture-of-doriangray-the.php
Steen G. J., Cameron L. J., Cienki A. J. MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol. 2007. Vol. 22. № 1. P. 1–39. DOI : 10.1080/10926480709336752.
Steen G. J., Dorst A. G., Herrmann J. B., Kaal A. A., Krennmayr T., Pasma T. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam : John Benjamins, 2010. 238 р.
Wilde O. The Picture of Dorian Gray. URL: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/174?utm






