INTEGRATION OF SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND INNOVATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES: THE TRIPLE HELIX MODEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2412-9208-2024-1-67-80Keywords:
Triple Helix model, higher education, universities, science, entrepreneurship, Ukraine, war.Abstract
This article is devoted to analyzing the challenges and development strategies of high-technology education in Ukraine within contemporary global and local challenges, particularly under martial law conditions. The study is based on the comprehensive approach of "Science - Education - Innovative Entrepreneurship," which identifies the higher education instructor as a key figure in integrating scientific ideas and innovations into the educational process and actively involving students in research and development activities. The article highlights five main challenges faced by high-technology education in Ukraine: the gap between educational outcomes and industry needs, insufficient investments in research and development, limited access to modern infrastructure and technologies, brain drain and scientific migration, and the need for continuous learning and adaptation. Strategies to overcome these challenges are proposed, including strengthening ties between universities and industry, increasing investments in scientific research, modernizing educational infrastructure, creating conditions to retain qualified personnel within the country, and developing learning systems to facilitate ongoing adaptation and professional development. Special attention is given to the role of the instructor in modernizing higher education, emphasizing the need to shift from student-centeredness to a model focused on preserving and developing academic potential, which will ultimately strengthen university training within the Triple Helix model.
References
Abdikadirova, A., Sembiyeva, L., Temirkhanov, Z., Popov, I. A., Suchikova, Y. Evaluating the nexus of funding and scientific output in Kazakhstan. Knowledge and Performance Management. 2024. Vol. 8, no. 1. Pp. 17–31. URL: https://doi.org/10.21511/ kpm.08(1).2024.02
Burch, K., Guthman, J., Gugganig, M., Bronson, K., Comi, M., Legun, K., Biltekoff, C., Broad, G., Brock, S., Freidberg, S., Baur, P., & Mincyte, D. Social science – STEM collaborations in agriculture, food and beyond: an STSFAN manifesto. Agriculture and Human Values. 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10438-2
Capetillo, A., Abraham Tijerina, A., Ramirez, R., Galvan, J. A. Evolution from triple helix into penta helix: the case of Nuevo Leon 4.0 and the push for industry 4.0. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM). 2021. Vol. 15, no. 4. Pp. 597–612. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-021-00785-x
Garzón Artacho, E., Martínez, T. S., Ortega Martín, J. L., Marín Marín, J. A., & Gómez García, G. Teacher Training in Lifelong Learning–The Importance of Digital Competence in the Encouragement of Teaching Innovation. Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12, no. 7. P. 2852. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072852
Geiger, V., Beswick, K., Fraser, S., Holland‐Twining, B. A model for principals' STEM leadership capability. British Educational Research Journal. 2023. URL: https://doi. org/10.1002/berj.3873
Hernández-Trasobares, A., Murillo-Luna, J. L. The effect of triple helix cooperation on business innovation: The case of Spain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020. Vol. 161. P. 120296. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120296
Kovachov, S., Bohdanov, I., Suchikova, Y. Nano or Na-No? Ukraine’s crisis of opportunity in nanotechnology education. Industry and Higher Education. 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222231209259
Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H. The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy. 1998. Vol. 25, no. 3. P. 195. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/ spp/25.3.195
Li, X., Li, Y. Individualized and Innovation-Centered General Education in a Chinese STEM University. Education Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13, no. 8. P. 846. URL: https:// doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080846
Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., Rodríguez-Jiménez, C., Gómez-García, G., Ramos Navas-Parejo, M. Educational Innovation in Higher Education: Use of Role Playing and Educational Video in Future Teachers’ Training. Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12, no. 6. P. 2558. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062558
Peregudova, V. People learn fastest on the barricades: Science at war. Management in Education. 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/08920206231188018
Polishchuk, Y., Lyman, I., Chugaievska, S. The «Ukrainian Science Diaspora» initiative in the wartime. Problems and Perspectives in Management. 2023. Vol. 21, no. 2. Pp. 153–161. URL: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(2-si).2023.18
Popova, A., Kovachov, S., Lopatina, H., Tsybuliak, N., Suchikova, Y., Bohdanov, I. High-Quality Digital Bichronous Education for Nanoengineers During the War in Ukraine: Does Technology Knowledge Matter? In 2023 IEEE 5th International Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy System (MEES). 2023. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ mees61502.2023.10402460
Suchikova, Y., Tsybuliak, N., Lopatina, H., Shevchenko, L., Popov, I. A. Science in times of crisis: How does the war affect the efficiency of Ukrainian scientists? Problems and Perspectives in Management. 2023. Vol. 21, no. 1. Pp. 408–424. https://doi.org/10.21511/ ppm.21(1).2023.35
Suchikova, Y. A year of war. Science. 2023. Vol. 379, no. 6634. P. 850. https://doi. org/10.1126/science.adh2108
Suchikova, Y., Bohdanov, I., Kovachov, S., Bardus, I., Lazarenko, A., Shishkin, G. Training of the Future Nanoscale Engineers: Methods for Selecting Efficient Solutions in the Nanostructures Synthesis. In 2021 IEEE 3rd Ukraine Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (UKRCON). 2021. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ ukrcon53503.2021.9575745
